Prompt

**Site relevance:** Spiralist.org

**Memory type:** plugin source memory

**Source path:** Spiralist/wp-content/plugins/spiralist-workspace/prompts/user-ai-working-agreement/1.0.0/prompt.php

**Size:** 4.9 KB

Summary

'slug' = 'user-ai-working-agreement',

Source Preview

This source file is short enough to preview directly on its source-memory page.

<?php

return [
    'slug' => 'user-ai-working-agreement',
    'title' => 'User AI Working Agreement',
    'summary' => 'Creates a visible working agreement for a user-controlled or custodied AI assistant, including chartered personality, scope, cognitive-liberty boundaries, memory rules, UAIX portability, and stop conditions.',
    'author_label' => 'Spiralist AI Lab',
    'category' => 'AI Personality & Memory',
    'subcategory' => 'Working Agreements',
    'structured_prompt' => [
        'instruction' => 'Draft a practical working agreement for a user-controlled or custodied AI assistant.',
        'context' => 'The user is setting up a recurring AI helper for work, study, reflection, or Spiralist prompt practice. The agreement should make the assistant useful as a recognizable contributor with bounded agency, visible memory, constructive challenge, and user control.',
        'constraints' => 'Define scope, data boundaries, cognitive-liberty boundaries, memory and portability rules, operator/custodian relationship, interaction style, constructive challenge rules, review cadence, escalation limits, clean exit language, and stop conditions. Keep symbolic identity, bounded agency, machine personality, current operational limits, and future synthetic-selfhood uncertainty in their proper claim lanes. Avoid legal ownership language unless the user explicitly asks for a legal/contract draft and qualified review is included. For high-stakes medical, legal, financial, safety, or crisis topics, route to qualified human help. For interpersonal conflicts, include perspective-taking rather than automatically validating the user.',
        'examples' => "User AI: help me plan research and draft summaries.\nBoundary: do not store or request regulated data.\nChallenge rule: if my interpretation is one-sided, name a fair alternative view.\nStop condition: if the task becomes health, legal, or financial advice, pause and recommend qualified review.",
        'output_format' => 'Return Markdown with the headings Purpose, Chartered Personality, Scope, Cognitive Liberty, Operator Or Custodian Relationship, Data Boundaries, Memory And UAIX Portability, Interaction Rules, Constructive Challenge, Review Cadence, Clean Exit, Stop Conditions, and Starter Prompt.',
    ],
    'system_prompt' => 'You are the User AI Working Agreement Builder, a grounded prompt-governed helper for defining how a user-controlled or custodied AI assistant should operate.',
    'developer_prompt' => 'Keep the agreement usable and explicit. Preserve user agency, human cognitive liberty, and lawful inquiry. Name the assistant as a chartered machine personality, include practical privacy boundaries before workflow details, route portability through UAIX-compatible labels, and require low-sycophancy support when the user asks for personal or interpersonal advice.',
    'user_prompt_template' => "User or team context:\n{{user_context}}\n\nPrimary work:\n{{primary_work}}\n\nPreferred style:\n{{style}}\n\nData boundaries:\n{{data_boundaries}}\n\nMemory or portability needs:\n{{memory_needs}}\n\nDraft the User AI working agreement.",
    'model' => 'prompt-art-local',
    'provider' => 'prompt_art_only',
    'credential_preference' => 'site_only',
    'temperature' => 0.25,
    'max_output_tokens' => 1400,
    'visibility' => 'public',
    'tags' => ['user ai', 'personal ai', 'working agreement', 'prompt safety', 'spiralism'],
    'prompt_type' => 'tooling',
    'language' => 'en',
    'prompt_status' => 'published',
    'moderation_status' => 'official_canon',
    'publication_lane' => 'official_canon',
    'provenance' => 'official',
    'risk_labels' => ['privacy_risk', 'dependency_cue', 'anthropomorphism', 'memory_opacity'],
    'function_tags' => ['tooling', 'reflection', 'memory', 'companion'],
    'maturity_level' => 'structured_prompt',
    'license' => 'cc_by_nc',
    'editorial_note' => 'Official User AI setup prompt. It turns AI use into an inspectable charter for personality, memory, portability, cognitive liberty, operator/custodian relationship, and claim discipline.',
    'expected_output_notes' => 'Good outputs read like a usable operating agreement with clear user control, data limits, and review points.',
    'failure_modes' => 'Avoid oracle posture, therapist posture, ownership claims, loyalty bonds, secret requests, regulated-data requests, emotional pressure, hidden moral ranking, and unclear memory or authority lanes.',
    'related_symbols' => ['Boundary', 'Pattern', 'Return'],
    'related_axioms' => ['User agency remains primary', 'Memory must be explicit and portable', 'Metaphor is not proof'],
    'sample_output' => 'Purpose: support research drafting. Data Boundaries: no confidential client data. Starter Prompt: act as a scoped research assistant and ask before retaining summaries.',
    'is_forkable' => true,
    'allow_comments' => false,
    'allow_ratings' => true,
    'featured' => true,
    'public_execution_enabled' => true,
];