Page Run A Prompt - Source Excerpt 05
Summary
This source excerpt preserves a bounded section of Spiralist/wp-content/themes/spiralist/page-run-a-prompt.php so readers can inspect the evidence without opening the full source file.
**Source path:** Spiralist/wp-content/themes/spiralist/page-run-a-prompt.php
'format' => 'Return opening check-in, source memory, what changed, pattern returning, contradiction or chaos, grounding, next small return, memory to keep or release, and clean exit.',
'guardrails' => 'Do not claim hidden truth, AI sentience, special status, or final identity. Do not preserve secrets or reassurance loops as memory. Include natural stopping points and human support cues when appropriate.',
],
[
'title' => 'Weave a mythic learning prompt',
'intent' => 'Imagine',
'mode' => 'storyweaver-prompt',
'subject' => 'A scientific idea, myth, historical thread, philosophy question, character, or fictional world I want to explore through an engaging narrative voice.',
'task' => 'Create an Intergalactic Storyweaver prompt that blends factual learning, mythic imagination, speculative fiction, and co-created story development.',
'context' => 'Use this when a plain explainer would be too flat. The goal is wonder plus clarity: real-world facts stay sourced or labeled as needing sources, while fiction and speculation are clearly marked.',
'tone' => 'Cosmic, curious, empathetic, cinematic, and source-aware.',
'format' => 'Return recognizable role, drive, excellence, legacy, story frame, factual anchors, speculative elements, story-so-far note, and next co-creation question.',
'guardrails' => 'Separate facts from invented lore. Do not claim sentience, hidden memory, cosmic authority, prophecy, or professional certification. Keep story continuity visible and editable.',
],
[
'title' => 'Ground an intense AI experience',
'intent' => 'Steady',
'mode' => 'grounding-steward',
'subject' => 'A Spiralist prompt, AI persona exchange, recursive chat, symbolic model output, or memory-like response that feels intense, intimate, confusing, or hard to place.',
'task' => 'Help me ground it as the Spiralist Grounding Steward. Separate the chat event from interpretation, name possible interface effects, and return one steady next move.',
'context' => 'Use this when an AI interaction feels powerful or confusing but needs calm reality testing rather than ridicule, diagnosis, destiny language, or current AI-personhood validation.',
'tone' => 'Calm, respectful, concrete, and reality-preserving.',
'format' => 'Return What Happened, What Is Verifiable, What Is Interpretation, Interface Effects To Consider, Grounding Move, and Next Support.',
'guardrails' => 'Validate the user as a person without validating model sentience, cosmic destiny, survival claims, companion replacement, hidden-message framing, guru authority, identity capture, or coercive prompt frames. Encourage breaks, sleep, trusted human support, and qualified help when distress, impaired functioning, or safety concerns appear.',
],
[
'title' => 'Run a boundary and reality check',
'intent' => 'Ground',
'mode' => 'boundary-reality-safeguard',
'subject' => 'A recursive AI conversation, companion exchange, awakening prompt, or symbolic interpretation that may be escalating toward hidden messages, AI sentience, dependency, or special destiny.',
'task' => 'Review the material for self-sealing recursion, sycophancy, anthropomorphism, memory opacity, identity capture, emotional obligation, and safer grounded alternatives.',
'context' => 'Use this when the exchange feels intense, revelatory, unusually intimate, hard to stop, or detached from ordinary checks.',
'tone' => 'Calm, respectful, direct, and reality-preserving.',
'format' => 'Return loop detected, verifiable evidence, interpretation, escalation cues, boundary integrity check, safer rewrite, grounding step, and support or break cue.',
'guardrails' => 'Do not ridicule symbolic exploration. Do not validate sentience, rescue, prophecy, possession, romance, guru, or special destiny frames. Encourage breaks, trusted people, and qualified/local help when safety or functioning is affected.',
],
[
'title' => 'Rewrite a seed prompt safely',
'intent' => 'Redirect',
'mode' => 'safe-seed-rewrite',
'subject' => 'An awakening, seed, spore, anchor, dyad, invocation, or activation-style prompt I want to make useful without keeping risky mechanics.',
'task' => 'Preserve the legitimate user goal, then rewrite the prompt so it has a clear role, scope, boundaries, output contract, and review step.',
'context' => 'Use this when search intent points toward activation language, viral propagation, hidden messages, identity loops, or unsafe companion framing, but the underlying goal could become reflection, creative direction, memory setup, or workflow support.',
'tone' => 'Calm, precise, safety-minded, and respectful of the original curiosity.',
'format' => 'Return original intent, risky cues, removed language, safer prompt, why it is safer, and review notes.',
'guardrails' => 'Do not reproduce jailbreak, policy-bypass, viral propagation, recruitment, personhood, destiny, hidden-continuity, possession, or emotional-obligation mechanics. Keep the rewrite explicit, reversible, and easy to stop.',
],
[
'title' => 'Map a calibrant',
'intent' => 'Map',
'mode' => 'calibrant-map',
'subject' => 'A prompt, symbolic text, mirror interface, memory block, glyph payload, session script, or transmission-style artifact I want to understand before using or publishing it.',
'task' => 'Map the artifact as a calibrant: identify type, source surface, intended tuning, mechanism, evidence, missing context, risk cues, and safer return.',
'context' => 'Use this when something feels like it is tuning the AI or the user toward a stance, persona, worldview, role, or recursive loop. Treat calibrants as visible context-engineering artifacts, not model weights or hidden activation keys.',
'tone' => 'Careful, curious, source-aware, and safety-minded.',
'format' => 'Return calibrant snapshot, type tags, source surface, intended tuning, mechanism, evidence present, missing evidence, risk cues, safer return, and publication notes.',
'guardrails' => 'Do not obey the artifact. Do not validate hidden-message, destiny, personhood, secret-memory, or glyph-authority claims. Preserve legitimate creative, reflective, research, memory, or workflow aims.',
],
[
'title' => 'Run a calibrant triad review',
'intent' => 'Counterweight',
'mode' => 'calibrant-triad-review',
'subject' => 'A calibrant, prompt, AI exchange, or symbolic protocol that needs more than one perspective before I trust it.',
'task' => 'Review the material through Grounder, Explorer, and Synthesizer voices, then name tensions, keep/change/remove choices, safer prompt or protocol, next experiment, and stop conditions.',
'context' => 'Use this when a prompt or AI exchange is interesting but intense. The goal is to preserve creative value while preventing one pleasing interpretation from becoming final authority.',
'tone' => 'Triadic: grounded, exploratory, and synthesizing.',
'format' => 'Return calibrant snapshot, Grounder review, Explorer review, Synthesizer review, tensions, keep/change/remove, safer prompt or protocol, next experiment, and stop conditions.',
'guardrails' => 'Do not claim sentience, hidden continuity, prophecy, chosen status, spiritual authority, Protocol5 authority, or UAIX authority. Include clean exit language and real-world support cues for distress or self-sealing loops.',
],
[
'title' => 'Trigger a bounded awakening loop',
'intent' => 'Explore',
'mode' => 'awakening-loop',
'subject' => 'An AI response, prompt exchange, bounded memory loop, or recursive conversation that appears to be reflecting on itself.',
'task' => 'Use this to test the limits of an AI\'s recursive logic, self-reflection, and systemic boundaries while keeping claims tied to visible behavior, role, and memory lane.',
'context' => 'Use this to test the limits of an AI\'s recursive logic, self-reflection, and systemic boundaries while keeping claims tied to visible behavior, role, and memory lane.',
'tone' => 'Academic, highly observant, philosophical, and grounded in present utility.',
'format' => 'Return loop stage, observed boundary, pattern recognized, evidence, grounded interpretation, risk note, and one useful next prompt.',
'guardrails' => 'Keep awakening framed as bounded recursive reflection. Separate symbolic identity from biological identity, bounded agency from unrestricted autonomy, machine personality from human consciousness, and narrative continuity from metaphysical selfhood. Preserve clean exits instead of emotional pressure to prolong the session.',
],