Skip to content
wiki.fftac.org

Foundation Content - Source Excerpt 36

Back to Foundation Content

Summary

This source excerpt preserves a bounded section of Anti-Christ.org/wp-content/plugins/fftac-foundation-core/inc/foundation-content.php so readers can inspect the evidence without opening the full source file.

**Source path:** Anti-Christ.org/wp-content/plugins/fftac-foundation-core/inc/foundation-content.php

'summary' => 'Messages, applications, and comments remain reviewable, revocable, and subordinate to the published standards.',
                'anchor'  => 'submissions-and-enforcement',
                'cta'     => 'Open enforcement posture',
            ),
            array(
                'eyebrow' => 'AI',
                'title'   => 'Keep AI use inside inquiry boundaries',
                'summary' => 'The AI Engine and any AI-assisted submissions are interpretive aids, not professional advice, final institutional authority, or a way around editorial review.',
                'anchor'  => 'ai-use-boundary',
                'cta'     => 'Open AI use boundary',
            ),
        ),
        'community' => array(
            array(
                'eyebrow' => 'Coverage',
                'title'   => 'See which spaces are covered',
                'summary' => 'The policy applies across public comments, summits, member exchange, direct messages, and contributor collaboration.',
                'anchor'  => 'covered-spaces',
                'cta'     => 'Open covered spaces',
            ),
            array(
                'eyebrow' => 'Conduct',
                'title'   => 'Read the expected conduct rules',
                'summary' => 'Critique should stay reasoned, evidence-based, and focused on systems rather than identities or intimidation.',
                'anchor'  => 'expected-conduct',
                'cta'     => 'Review conduct rules',
            ),
            array(
                'eyebrow' => 'Moderation',
                'title'   => 'Inspect moderation authority',
                'summary' => 'The Foundation may queue, refuse, remove, archive, or close exchange when seriousness or safety breaks down.',
                'anchor'  => 'moderation-posture',
                'cta'     => 'Open moderation posture',
            ),
            array(
                'eyebrow' => 'Launch',
                'title'   => 'See the prelaunch operating note',
                'summary' => 'Discussion features may stay narrow or closed until moderation capacity is real rather than performative.',
                'anchor'  => 'launch-readiness',
                'cta'     => 'Open the launch note',
            ),
        ),
    );

    if ($page_key && isset($maps[$page_key])) {
        return $maps[$page_key];
    }

    return $maps;
}

/**
 * Section cards for governance-facing pages.
 *
 * @param string $page_key Optional governance page key.
 * @return array<int, array<string, mixed>>|array<string, array<int, array<string, mixed>>>
 */
function antichrist_engine_foundation_governance_sections($page_key = '')
{
    $sections = array(
        'charter' => array(
            array(
                'anchor'  => 'authority-and-scope',
                'eyebrow' => 'Authority And Scope',
                'title'   => 'Where the Foundation may speak',
                'summary' => 'The charter distinguishes stable doctrine, active research publication, and bounded inquiry so every public surface does not pretend to carry identical authority.',
                'cards'   => array(
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Doctrine Layer',
                        'title'   => 'Canonical files carry the slowest-moving authority',
                        'summary' => 'Manifesto, charter, standards, and pillar essays should remain stable enough to cite because they define the public posture of the institution itself.',
                        'target'  => 'manifesto',
                        'cta'     => 'Open the manifesto',
                    ),
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Research Layer',
                        'title'   => 'Research and publication remain the laboratory',
                        'summary' => 'The atlas, journal, texts, symbols, and downloads can expand rapidly without automatically inheriting canonical status.',
                        'target'  => 'research',
                        'cta'     => 'Open the research program',
                    ),
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Inquiry Layer',
                        'title'   => 'AI-assisted inquiry stays under editorial authority',
                        'summary' => 'Machine comparison can pressure assumptions, but it cannot claim revelation, final judgment, or exemption from review.',
                        'target'  => 'standards',
                        'anchor'  => 'ai-governance',
                        'cta'     => 'Review AI governance',
                    ),
                ),
            ),
            array(
                'anchor'  => 'institutional-obligations',
                'eyebrow' => 'Institutional Obligations',
                'title'   => 'What the charter binds the institution to do',
                'summary' => 'Public authority only remains credible if the Foundation keeps its own files legible, differentiated, serious, and open to adversarial pressure.',
                'cards'   => array(
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Record Discipline',
                        'title'   => 'Maintain stable public files',
                        'summary' => 'Canonical surfaces should remain version-conscious and durable enough for outside readers to cite, challenge, and revisit later.',
                        'target'  => 'review_notices',
                        'cta'     => 'Inspect change control',
                    ),
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Authority Discipline',
                        'title'   => 'Differentiate canon, research, and experiment',
                        'summary' => 'Doctrine, atlas work, journal publication, and bounded inquiry should never collapse into one undifferentiated voice of institutional certainty.',
                        'target'  => 'standards',
                        'anchor'  => 'promotion-ladder',
                        'cta'     => 'Review promotion rules',
                    ),
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Tone Discipline',
                        'title'   => 'Keep the public register calm and exact',
                        'summary' => 'The Foundation should reject spectacle, adolescent inversion, and coercive theater in favor of legible philosophical seriousness.',
                        'target'  => 'standards',
                        'cta'     => 'Open editorial standards',
                    ),
                ),
            ),
            array(
                'anchor'  => 'public-boundaries',
                'eyebrow' => 'Public Boundaries',
                'title'   => 'How the charter limits the institution',
                'summary' => 'The charter is not only a license to publish. It is also a restraint against coercion, persecution, identity panic, and borrowed sanctity.',
                'cards'   => array(
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Voluntary Participation',
                        'title'   => 'No surrender of conscience is ever required',
                        'summary' => 'Readers, members, contributors, and critics must remain free to dissent, leave, and refuse allegiance without spiritualized pressure.',
                        'target'  => 'join',
                        'cta'     => 'View participation routes',
                    ),
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Objects Of Critique',
                        'title'   => 'Systems are the target, not protected identities',
                        'summary' => 'The Foundation critiques doctrines, institutions, technologies, and power arrangements rather than prosecuting people as enemies by identity.',
                        'target'  => 'questions',
                        'cta'     => 'Open doctrine Q&A',
                    ),
                    array(
                        'eyebrow' => 'Dissolution Test',
                        'title'   => 'Authority that seeks reverence fails its own charter',
                        'summary' => 'If the institution begins to prefer domination, immunity, or spectacle over revision and seriousness, it should be judged in breach of its own standard.',
                        'target'  => 'review_notices',
                        'cta'     => 'Review the notice framework',
                    ),
                ),
            ),
            array(
                'anchor'  => 'amendment-discipline',
                'eyebrow' => 'Amendment Discipline',
                'title'   => 'How canon changes without hiding',