Virtual Pages - Source Excerpt 84

Back to Virtual Pages

Summary

This source excerpt preserves a bounded section of 2IA.org/wp-content/themes/twoia-intelligence/inc/virtual-pages.php so readers can inspect the evidence without opening the full source file.

**Source path:** 2IA.org/wp-content/themes/twoia-intelligence/inc/virtual-pages.php

'sources'          => __( 'Source categories: methodology notes, ethics policies, public records, privacy law, journalism ethics, platform policies, and correction requests.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'implications'     => __( 'Civil-liberties implication: a rights project loses legitimacy when it makes private people less safe to criticize public power.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'next_steps'       => __( 'Before publishing, ask whether the detail is necessary, lawful, proportionate, sourceable, correctable, and aimed at accountable power rather than private vulnerability.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'internal_links'   => __( '/ethics-and-civil-liberties/, /methodology/, /open-source-intelligence/, /corrections-and-right-of-reply/.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'meta_title'       => __( 'Public Intelligence vs Doxxing | 2IA', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'meta_description' => __( 'A civil-liberties boundary guide distinguishing lawful public intelligence from doxxing, exposure, harassment, and personal-data dumps.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
		),
	);
}

/**
 * Return issue hub outline blueprints.
 *
 * @return array
 */
function twoia_issue_hub_blueprints() {
	return array(
		array(
			'title'      => __( 'Metadata Is Identity', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'overview'   => __( 'Metadata is the relationship layer around digital life: time, place, device, routing, contact frequency, account linkage, transaction context, and service use.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'why'        => __( 'Metadata can reveal association, belief, movement, vulnerability, routine, and institutional contact without reading message content.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'works'      => __( 'Systems collect metadata through providers, platforms, apps, payments, devices, logs, brokers, and public-records systems, then link it to accounts or identifiers.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'wrong'      => __( 'Shared devices, stale identifiers, recycled numbers, bad geocoding, correlation errors, or weak identity matching can harden into a durable profile.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'benefits'   => __( 'Providers, agencies, platforms, brokers, and vendors benefit when relationship data is easy to retain, query, package, or buy.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'harmed'     => __( 'People harmed include protesters, journalists, sources, patients, religious minorities, immigrants, workers, and anyone whose association is sensitive even when lawful.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'terms'      => __( 'Key terms: call-detail record, device identifier, subscriber information, location ping, retention schedule, link analysis, correlation, selector, data minimization.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'records'    => __( 'Documents to request: retention schedules, query logs, data-sharing agreements, access policies, deletion rules, correction procedures, vendor data dictionaries, and audit reports.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'questions'  => __( 'Questions for officials: who can query metadata, for what purpose, under what authority, what is logged, and how can a person correct a bad link?', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'actors'     => __( 'Actors to map: telecoms, platforms, mobile apps, data brokers, law-enforcement fusion centers, records custodians, and analytics vendors.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'references' => __( 'References to verify: EFF surveillance resources, provider transparency reports, privacy-impact assessments, court filings, and agency retention manuals.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'related'    => __( 'Related 2IA work: /metadata-is-identity/, /two-identities/, /surveillance-systems/, /public-records-and-foia/.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'steps'      => __( 'Request retention rules, ask for correction paths, identify downstream sharing, and separate content claims from metadata inference.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
		),
		array(
			'title'      => __( 'Surveillance Architecture', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'overview'   => __( 'Surveillance architecture is the full stack: sensors, providers, brokers, databases, dashboards, contractors, policies, budgets, and oversight.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'why'        => __( 'It matters because rights are often weakened by architecture before any individual decision is visible.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'works'      => __( 'Systems ingest records, fuse sources, assign access roles, retain data, share outputs, and sometimes automate triage.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'wrong'      => __( 'Failure modes include mission creep, broad access, weak audit, hidden vendor claims, long retention, and deletion that never happens.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'benefits'   => __( 'Agencies get reach and speed; vendors get recurring contracts, data integrations, and proof points for the next sale.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'harmed'     => __( 'Communities harmed include people under disproportionate monitoring, lawful activists, neighborhoods treated as data zones, and people with no practical way to inspect the system.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'terms'      => __( 'Key terms: ingestion, integration, access control, audit log, data-sharing agreement, retention, renewal, scope of work, sole source, mission creep.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'records'    => __( 'Documents to request: contracts, system diagrams, policies, training, audit logs, data-sharing agreements, privacy reviews, and renewal notices.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'questions'  => __( 'Questions for officials: what enters the system, who can query it, what leaves it, and who audits the auditors?', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'actors'     => __( 'Actors to map: purchasing offices, legal counsel, program managers, vendors, subcontractors, oversight boards, auditors, and public-records officers.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'references' => __( 'References to verify: EFF Street-Level Surveillance, procurement records, public meeting packets, and inspector-general reports.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'related'    => __( 'Related 2IA work: /surveillance-systems/, /public-records-and-foia/, /research-archive/, /methodology/.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'steps'      => __( 'Read the contract, attend the meeting, ask for the audit clause, and request retention schedules.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
		),
		array(
			'title'      => __( 'Public Records And FOIA', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'overview'   => __( 'Public-records work turns hidden policy into records the public can inspect, cite, appeal, and correct.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'why'        => __( 'It matters because official claims are easier to challenge when contracts, budgets, policies, and emails are visible.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'works'      => __( 'Requesters identify the agency, name existing records, narrow the date range, track responses, and appeal overbroad withholding.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'wrong'      => __( 'Agencies may delay, over-redact, claim no records, inflate fees, search the wrong office, or treat vendor material as untouchable.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'benefits'   => __( 'Public officials benefit when requesters do not know what records exist; the public benefits when requests create a durable record trail.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'harmed'     => __( 'People harmed by opacity include residents affected by procurement decisions, people misclassified by systems, and communities excluded from oversight.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'terms'      => __( 'Key terms: custodian, exemption, segregable material, fee waiver, rolling release, administrative appeal, no-records response, search adequacy.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'records'    => __( 'Documents to request: RFPs, bids, contracts, emails, policies, audits, retention schedules, invoices, and impact assessments.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'questions'  => __( 'Questions for officials: which office owns the records, what search terms were used, and what exemptions justify each withholding?', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'actors'     => __( 'Actors to map: records officers, program offices, procurement staff, legal counsel, vendors, appeal authorities, and oversight bodies.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'references' => __( 'References to verify: FOIA.gov, DOJ Office of Information Policy, state public-records guides, and agency FOIA logs.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'related'    => __( 'Related 2IA work: /public-records-and-foia/, /methodology/, /corrections-and-right-of-reply/, /research-archive/.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
			'steps'      => __( 'Send one narrow request, track deadlines, ask for electronic records, and appeal with specific reasons.', 'two-identities-anonymous' ),
		),
		array(