Skip to content
wiki.fftac.org

Virtual Pages - Source Excerpt 12

Back to Virtual Pages

Summary

This source excerpt preserves a bounded section of 2IA.org/wp-content/themes/twoia-intelligence/inc/virtual-pages.php so readers can inspect the evidence without opening the full source file.

**Source path:** 2IA.org/wp-content/themes/twoia-intelligence/inc/virtual-pages.php

'body'  => 'Ask whether errors cluster by language, disability, race, neighborhood, device sharing, poverty, protected activity, or data-source quality. A civil-liberties audit looks for who pays for mistakes.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Delete Or Quarantine Bad Records',
					'body'  => 'Correction should include deletion, quarantine, annotation, downstream notification, appeal closure, and retention review. Leaving stale suspicion in place converts a mistake into a permanent shadow file.',
				),
			),
		),
		'ethics-and-civil-liberties' => array(
			'eyebrow'           => 'Rights, authorization, harm reduction',
			'summary'           => '2IA is loud about liberty and strict about method: lawful sourcing, minimization, consent where practical, authorization boundaries, source care, correction, and public accountability without reckless exposure.',
			'overview_sections' => array(
				array(
					'title' => 'The Rights Stack',
					'body'  => array(
						'Speech, press, petition, assembly, privacy, anonymity, due process, public records, disability rights, immigrant rights, and equal protection all shape how public-intelligence work should be done.',
					),
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'No Grey-Hat Exception',
					'body'  => array(
						'Public-interest motives do not create permission to access systems, bypass controls, test vulnerabilities, scrape recklessly, expose private people, or pressure targets. Security research belongs inside authorization and disclosure rules.',
					),
				),
			),
			'sections'          => array(
				array(
					'title' => 'Necessity And Proportionality',
					'body'  => 'Collect only what answers a legitimate public question. Do not gather more personal data than needed, keep it longer than needed, or repurpose it without review.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Authorization Is A Bright Line',
					'body'  => 'Do not probe infrastructure, bypass access controls, test vulnerabilities, impersonate, scrape behind limits, trade exploits, or treat curiosity as consent. Defensive security belongs in authorized programs and responsible disclosure channels.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Minimize Before Publication',
					'body'  => 'Cut bystanders, minors, victims, private addresses, medical details, credentials, private beliefs, and unrelated identifiers unless essential and lawful. Public accountability does not require maximum exposure.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Source Protection Without False Promises',
					'body'  => 'Explain what a contact channel is and is not. Do not imply secure-drop capability unless the infrastructure, process, and staffing actually support it. Ordinary contact is not safe for secrets.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Evidence Care',
					'body'  => 'When material may become evidence, preserve source, date, handling history, access limits, and integrity notes at a governance level. This is not forensic instruction; it is accountable record care.',
				),
			),
		),
		'lawful-contact' => array(
			'eyebrow'           => 'Truthful public channels',
			'summary'           => 'Use official public channels for their intended purpose. Be truthful, narrow, non-automated, respectful, and record-focused. Contact is not a signal-tripping exercise.',
			'overview_sections' => array(
				array(
					'title' => 'Ordinary Contact Is Powerful Enough',
					'body'  => array(
						'Public-records requests, public comments, official forms, board testimony, ombuds complaints, inspector-general referrals, and correction letters can create a paper trail without gamesmanship.',
					),
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Do Not Provoke Systems',
					'body'  => array(
						'Do not automate mass outreach, send suspicious attachments, probe networks, stress-test portals, trigger sensors, or attempt to interact with monitoring infrastructure.',
					),
				),
			),
			'sections'          => array(
				array(
					'title' => 'Use The Right Channel',
					'body'  => 'Use published email addresses, public comment processes, official forms, ordinary mail, records portals, ombuds offices, court clerks, board calendars, or agency hotlines for their stated purpose.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Be Truthful And Narrow',
					'body'  => 'Say who you are when required, what record or issue you are asking about, what date range matters, and what action you want. Do not misrepresent identity, authority, affiliation, or purpose.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Separate Records From Pressure',
					'body'  => 'FOIA and public-records systems are for records requests. Keep requests focused, lawful, and relevant; do not use them as greetings, threats, spam, or performance.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Keep Your Own Paper Trail',
					'body'  => 'Save dates, confirmations, request numbers, fee notices, extensions, denials, names, and attachments. A careful log strengthens appeals and protects against confusion.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'No Operational Contact',
					'body'  => 'Do not ask 2IA or any public agency for intrusion help, evasion advice, target selection, sensor tests, doxxing, social engineering, disruption, or suspicious file handling.',
				),
			),
		),
		'research-archive' => array(
			'eyebrow'           => 'Issue hubs, dossiers, trackers, corrections',
			'summary'           => 'The archive should be the memory layer of 2IA: issue hubs, dossiers, organization profiles, records guides, toolkits, trackers, corrections, source matrices, and publication plans.',
			'overview_sections' => array(
				array(
					'title' => 'From Framework Site To Working Library',
					'body'  => array(
						'The reports agree on the main gap: 2IA has strong posture and trust architecture, but needs a deeper inventory of finished, indexed, useful artifacts.',
						'The archive should convert the site from a manifesto into a durable civic resource.',
					),
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'What The Archive Should Contain',
					'body'  => array(
						'Publish issue hubs, dossiers, records-request templates, organization profiles, link-check notes, correction logs, system-failure cards, public-records trackers, and practical guide pages.',
					),
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Editorial Disposition',
					'body'  => array(
						'Each report input should be triaged as public-safe copy, internal context, duplicate context, deferred work, or blocked misuse guidance. Not every useful research note belongs on a public page.',
					),
				),
			),
			'sections'          => array(
				array(
					'title' => 'Issue Hubs',
					'body'  => 'Build durable hubs for surveillance architecture, metadata, AI surveillance, OSINT, public records, false positives, keyword monitoring, civil liberties, psychological warfare, hacktivism, and lawful contact.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Dossiers And Case Studies',
					'body'  => 'A dossier should contain an executive summary, public-interest question, evidence table, timeline, source notes, confidence labels, minimization decisions, right-of-reply status, and records requested.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Organization Profiles',
					'body'  => 'The directory should use stable profile URLs, role taxonomy, jurisdiction, official link, source-priority notes, review date, risk label, correction route, and context for controversial or historical entries.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Toolkits And Templates',
					'body'  => 'Turn repeated civic work into copyable formats: FOIA request, procurement review, AI model questions, correction letter, privacy review, volunteer research note, and issue-hub evidence table.',
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'Trackers And Corrections',
					'body'  => 'Use trackers for pending records, publication status, stale pages, broken links, review dates, right-of-reply outcomes, and corrections. The archive should show what changed and what remains unknown.',
				),
			),
		),
		'about' => array(
			'eyebrow'           => 'Two Identities Of Anonymous',
			'summary'           => '2IA is an independent civil-liberties and public-intelligence research desk about surveillance, identity, metadata, AI inference, OSINT, records, false positives, organizations, and lawful accountability.',
			'overview_sections' => array(
				array(
					'title' => 'What 2IA Is',
					'body'  => array(
						'2IA explains public power in a way ordinary readers can verify: the system, the record, the rights issue, the uncertainty, the correction path, and the next public move.',
					),
				),
				array(
					'title' => 'What 2IA Is Not',
					'body'  => array(
						'2IA is not a leaks site, hacking guide, secure drop, private investigation shop, law firm, government office, surveillance vendor, or platform enforcement team.',
					),
				),
			),
			'sections'          => array(
				array(
					'title' => 'Independent And Civil-Libertarian',